No subtitles for this video yet.
Nike Lunarlon vs Adidas Boost: Which is Better? (Non Performance Comparison Review)
DescriptionHere is a video comparison between the 2 dueling technologies: Nike "Lunarlon" vs Adidas "Boost". Please note this is a personal comparison and is not a performance based comparison as I am not a runner. This review is based on style, comfort, responsiveness, cushioning, and durability. I have been a Nike LunarlonMore
Here is a video comparison between the 2 dueling technologies: Nike "Lunarlon" vs Adidas "Boost". Please note this is a personal comparison and is not a performance based comparison as I am not a runner. This review is based on style, comfort, responsiveness, cushioning, and durability.
I have been a Nike Lunarlon fan for 5 years, since the Lunarglide 1, and it has been my favorite technology with regards to comfort. A couple months ago I went to the Adidas Employee store and I saw the boost technology and was intrigued. It sounded responsive and looked like a smart gimmick, but as I looked closer I realized it was definitely a valid technology. I have since then bought a couple pairs and in this video I review a couple different models of each brand:
Adidas Energy Boost 2 $160
Adidas Rocket Boost $140
Adidas Sequence Boost $130
Nike Lunarglide 4/5 $110
Nike Flyknit 1 $150
Nike Flyknit Chukka $170
In summary of the review, both technologies are excellent. If I had to rate all of the sneakers in the video the Nike Flyknit Chukka would be #1, followed by the Adidas Rocket Boost at #2. Either way you go you will be happy in my opinion, just try on the models at for local stores before you buy, some models fit different! The Energy boost is very snug, while the Rocket boost is very relaxed and max cushioning. (I didn't have the Pure Boost on hand). The flyknit Chukka doesn't provide as much support as something like the Sequence Boost. I think that tough competition
- Loading…