No subtitles for this video yet.
Why 2 Inches of Ease Becomes 3.38 (Joseph-Armstrong)
DescriptionIn this video I investigate why the Joseph-Armstrong bodice block ends up with approximately 3⅜ inches ease at the bust level — even though only 2 inches ease is added in the drafting instructions. This became a puzzle that bothered me for years. The maths didn’t seem to make sense: • ¼ inch ease added to the front •More
In this video I investigate why the Joseph-Armstrong bodice block ends up with approximately 3⅜ inches ease at the bust level — even though only 2 inches ease is added in the drafting instructions.
This became a puzzle that bothered me for years.
The maths didn’t seem to make sense:
• ¼ inch ease added to the front
• ¾ inch ease added to the back
= 2 inches total ease
So where was the extra ease coming from?
After repeatedly checking the drafting process, re-reading the measuring instructions, and comparing the measurement charts from both the 4th and 5th editions, I eventually realised that the system is not based purely on the bust circumference.
In this video I explain:
• why the Standard Figure ends up with more ease than expected
• how the Front Bust Arc and Back High Bust Arc affect the final result
• why custom measurements can produce very different amounts of ease
• and why some people may end up with significantly more — or less — ease than others when following the same instructions
This video is not intended as criticism of the Joseph-Armstrong system. These drafting systems were developed primarily for the mass production of garments and are fit for that purpose. My focus here is simply understanding how the system works and how the measurements interact.
This topic is also closely related to high-bust ease, which I’ll cover in an upcoming video.
The downloadable booklet is in the pinned comment; scroll down to see the link.
Buy my Booklets
My Booklets
- Loading…