Top 5 FAILED Sneaker Cushioning Technologies!

See part 2 of my Top 5 FAILED Sneaker Techs here! https://youtu.be/XI_hfFtJHz8 See more Top 5 Sneaker videos here! https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9XD2DCN230LqNID5vTmvhZ_oo5sD1kTU\ Business Contact email : heskicks@gmail.com Top 5 failed sneaker technologies Avia — Cantilever Technology Sneaker Shown: Avia 830 Year (Innovation): 1979 Cantilever technology centers the heel of a shoe over a concave sole such that the sole "acts as a trampoline" to soften the force of impact, add support and provide a return in energy to one's stride. The company is also known for some of the performance technologies built into their shoes, including the Cantilever Heel (heel support), the ARC – Anatomical Rebound Cradle (comprehensive foot cushioning and arch support), and Avia's FOM technology (shock compression).[10] In 1991, Avia filed a lawsuit against Nike, alleging that Nike's ''Air 180'' and ''Air Force 180'' running and basketball shoes infringed upon Avia patents. Avia accused Nike of pirating its ''Cantilever'' technology, which uses a cushion to provide shock absorption and stability. The company contended the technology has been the basis of its products since Avia was founded in 1980. Avia widened the suit in January 1992[11] and settled in December 1992.[12] Converse React Converse — REACT Juice Technology Sneaker Shown: Converse Aero Jam Year: 1993 Wait, what? There's a responsive, seemingly radioactive fluid in my sneaker that may or may not automatically tra