PRP vs PRF: Which Is Better for Hair Loss & Skin Rejuvenation?

Dermatologist Dr. Dray breaks down PRP vs PRF, including how these platelet-based treatments work, what the research shows for hair loss, facial rejuvenation, wrinkles, skin texture, and under-eye concerns, and whether they are actually worth the cost. PRP, or platelet-rich plasma, and PRF, or platelet-rich fibrin, are increasingly popular cosmetic and hair loss treatments. PRF is often marketed as a newer or more advanced version of PRP, but does the evidence actually show that PRF is better? In this video, Dr. Dray explains the differences between platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), why PRP is not a standardized treatment, and how preparation methods can affect the final product. She also discusses the current evidence for: • PRP for androgenetic alopecia and hair loss • PRF for hair growth • PRP for skin rejuvenation and anti-aging • PRF for wrinkles, skin texture, and elasticity • PRP and PRF for the under-eye area • Whether PRF is actually better than PRP • What to ask before spending money on PRP or PRF treatments • How realistic the results are for hair loss and cosmetic rejuvenation While there is legitimate research supporting potential benefits from PRP, particularly for androgenetic alopecia, the evidence for PRF is less mature. Research on both treatments for facial rejuvenation is also limited by small studies, differences in preparation methods, and a lack of standardized treatment protocols. Dr. Dray also explains why a biologically